Bookmark and Share

This Question is Possibly Answered

1 "correct" answer available (5 pts) 1 "helpful" answer available (5 pts)
493 Views 18 Replies Last post: Nov 18, 2009 10:57 AM by Rick'sFamily RSS
toejamusa Newbie 7 posts since
Sep 22, 2009
Currently Being Moderated

Sep 22, 2009 8:31 AM

Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Why does IHG have such a nebulous standard for earning the Royal Ambassador status?

 

As an example, I am currently planning the rest of my travel for the year, and have about 30 more hotel nights in about 12 different countries. I generally split my time between IHG (primarily ICs and CPs) and Hiltons, as there is usually one or the other near where I need to go. If I concentrate more than 50% of my remaining stays at Hilton, I will have no problem in making HHonors Diamond. If I were to concentrate 80% of my nights at IHG, I might make RA (more than 50 nights with more than 3 different ICs), but I have no way of being sure.

 

Given this situation, I will probably push more on the HHilton for the rest of this year to make a sure Diamond. (Bird in the hand, so to speak).

Amanda Kehoe Master 1,289 posts since
Apr 11, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Sep 22, 2009 10:14 PM in response to: toejamusa
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Yeah the Royal Ambassador requirements are not disclosed completely as it is invitation only. Are you currently an Ambassador member as that is a requirement to be invited into the Royal Ambassador "club?"  What are the perks as a Hilton Diamond member? I think you should try to work at obtaining RA status.

 

My fellow Royal Ambassador and fellow blogger, Ronald Chadwick, wrote a blog post about Royal Ambassador Qualifications. Check it out! I thought you might find it interesting. Also there is another thread discussing the topic as well.

 

Enjoy exploring the community. Feel free to check out the blog posts from Ronald, "Contessa Vanessa", and myself. Post a comment under my blog if you find anything interesting.

 

 

Thanks,

Amanda Kehoe

JBa Premier Contributor 800 posts since
Jun 11, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Sep 23, 2009 2:23 AM in response to: toejamusa
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Hello toejamusa.

 

First welcome to PCC. Since you already replied to the A/RA luggage tag thread I guess that you are at least Ambassador.

 

The qualification for RA is kind of nebulous, but once you've achieved it you do like it. I prefer the RA status at ICs over the Diamond status Hilton because you get the 2 category upgrade and the free minibar. HH Dia gives you also status at the lower end of the Hilton hotels and you get your upgrade and free breakfast at any of the Hilton hotels.

 

If you stay enough nights that you can achieve bot Dia and RA status I would go for both. The perks that you get as an RA definitely are worth it. As of now it looks like you need to be closer to 60 nights with at least 3 stays at an IC. If you have more stays at ICs you might even get the status with less nights.

 

The decission is yours which program you think is the best for you I would go with.

 

JBa

Amanda Kehoe Master 1,289 posts since
Apr 11, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Sep 24, 2009 8:43 PM in response to: toejamusa
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Toejamusa,

 

What are the perks/benefits of being a Hilton Diamond member?

 

Thanks,

Amanda Kehoe

Amanda Kehoe Master 1,289 posts since
Apr 11, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Sep 25, 2009 1:45 PM in response to: toejamusa
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

ToeJam,

 

Thanks for including a little insight about the Diamond program. I like to hear from members themselves about their opinions or experiences with other programs or non-related Priority Club stuff.

 

 

Thanks for the Info,

Amanda Kehoe

Rick'sFamily Premier Contributor 854 posts since
Jun 18, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Sep 27, 2009 4:02 PM in response to: toejamusa
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Hello,

This issue has been in a lot of threads, it really seems quite silly to have so much secrecy around the membership doesn't it?

With all your travels, I bet you get the RA invitation, be sure to let us know when you do!
Best of luck to you!

Amanda Kehoe Master 1,289 posts since
Apr 11, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Sep 27, 2009 6:26 PM in response to: Rick'sFamily
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

In my opinion, it kind of adds to the enjoyment once one earns Royal Ambassador status. It's all about the recognition and status. When IHG invites an Ambassador member to the Royal Ambassador program, the member may get an ego boost & feel special knowing that they are one of the few in the "somewhat elusive secret club."

 

Secret benefits/memberships in the travel industry are not uncommon. Long long ago, the American Express Platinum card was invitation only--well now people have the Platinum card that shouldn't and if you are willing to pay the almost $500 yearly card fee then you are in!  So now the Centurion/Black card is the cool one.

 

So it goes back to the saying: "If one has to ask, then one probably doesn't qualify."

 

 

Just My Thoughts,

Amanda Kehoe

Rick'sFamily Premier Contributor 854 posts since
Jun 18, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Sep 27, 2009 9:28 PM in response to: Amanda Kehoe
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

"Feeling special", I suppose that IS what drives the program.

So you are saying the mystery of membership adds to the pleasure of becoming an RA, but the benefits really are what people seek.

..

peterg Newbie 11 posts since
Sep 24, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Sep 29, 2009 5:11 AM in response to: Rick'sFamily
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

I paid into Ambasador in Hong Kong recently, and was immediately upgraded to Royal, having been platinum PC for about 6 months or so with around 65 eligible nights this year.... Naively didnt consider Ambassador previously as I thought Priority Priviledge (which I joined last year) had similar benefits. Silly me...They did all they could not to laugh at me for having the temerity to request an upgrade!

 

cheers

 

Peter

Rick'sFamily Premier Contributor 854 posts since
Jun 18, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Sep 29, 2009 6:42 PM in response to: peterg
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Good to know.

Perhaps more of us will follow your advice, and buy into the Ambassador program.

Amanda Kehoe Master 1,289 posts since
Apr 11, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 2, 2009 5:20 PM in response to: Rick'sFamily
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Being invited to become a Royal Ambassador is something that would make any member feel recognized and appreciated...The invitation is the ultimate reward and  "Thank You" from InterContinental. Leaving the Royal Ambassador "qualifications" vague and "under the radar" achieves that. In my opinion, I don't know why any member would necessarily change his or her pattern of hotel choice to possibly achieve the status. The member is already loyal & a frequent guest in IHG hotels.

 

The additional benefits happen to be the "reward" of a loyal & very frequent traveler, not necessarily what a member purposely "seeks."

 

Just My Thoughts,

Amanda Kehoe

JBa Premier Contributor 800 posts since
Jun 11, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 18, 2009 12:55 PM in response to: toejamusa
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Just remember, and I'm not sure everybody knows that, 2 months before your ambassador / royal ambassador status expires, they look at your account and assess the nights you've stayed. Many of the RAs that I know didn't consider this and did not get their status renewed. But what do I know, only been an RA for a couple of years

 

Message was edited by: JBa Correct spelling of assess

Rick'sFamily Premier Contributor 854 posts since
Jun 18, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 18, 2009 10:57 AM in response to: JBa
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Hi JBa

I just noticed your typo which by this site's standards should have been censored!  A rather common word for donkey instead of the assess you meant to type.   I just found it humorous that they censor the word mother and others... but not that!

Ronald Chadwick Premier Contributor 1,211 posts since
Oct 2, 2008
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 18, 2009 10:17 AM in response to: toejamusa
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

It is truly another IHG mystery, I have an impression that the consideration is not only the number of nights but borderline cases may have their number of IC nights considered as well as future bookings. There may also be a consideration as to  the number of nights stayed after your year ends but not your status end.

Ronald Chadwick Premier Contributor 1,211 posts since
Oct 2, 2008
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 18, 2009 10:18 AM in response to: toejamusa
Re: Why the nebulous qualification standard for Royal Ambassador?

Congratulation. I guess it only intensifies the mystery.

Average User Rating
(0 ratings)

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)